Joint Position Paper on WEEE Recast, 2nd Reading

Published: 26 July 2011

Policies & Issues: Environment

In view of the European Institutions second reading on the Recast Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive, industry organisations, which represent producers of electrical and electronic equipment across all categories, call on regulators to ensure that the re-cast leads to improved environmental protection as well as greater efficiency and more effective enforcement of the Directive.

It is vital that the Recast does not create additional administrative burden, without any environmental benefit, for producers to comply with given the goals of the Recast and that they have made investments, both financial and human, in ensuring compliance with the Directive.

Industry is principally concerned with the following proposals arising from first reading:

*Extending the scope and reorganising the existing ten scope categories

*Applying the collection rate to producers and basing it on “EEE placed on the market”

*Extending producers' financing obligations for collection beyond agreed collection points

*Limiting legal shipments of used professional EEE to shipments for direct reuse or under warranty only

*Unsatisfactory provisions regarding transparency of collection/recycling costs having a separate preparation for reuse target

*The broad definition of WEEE from private households

*The lack of clarity on how the producer will be defined in the directive and how a workable registration model will be ensured

*Certain details of the proposals to develop eco-design and treatment standards

Related Position Papers

Environment: The European technology industries’ priorities for the sustainable use and management of water in Europe [14 November 2019]

Environment: Orgalim's response to a public consultation on sustainability requirements for batteries [27 August 2019]

Waste policy: Joint industry comments on modulating producers’ financial contributions for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment [26 July 2019]

Eunomia study in support of developing Guidance for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Schemes: Comments on modulation of producers’ financial contributions [12 March 2019]

Orgalim response: Consultation by Technical Expert Group on Sustainable Finance [25 February 2019]

Feedback on the usability of the taxonomy - Orgalim response [25 February 2019]

Orgalime response to consultation on RoHS Substance Review Methodology [21 December 2018]

Comments on Product and Organisational Environment Footprint methodologies (PEF/OEF) [19 December 2018]

Circular Economy: Resolving the interface between EU waste, product and chemicals policy [29 October 2018]