WEEE2: Draft Implementing Regulation establishing a Common Methodology for the Calculation of 'The weight of EEE placed on the national market in each MS' & a Common Methodology for the Calculation of the 'Quantity of WEEE Generated by Weight in each MS'

Published: 12 June 2015

Policies & Issues: Environment

According to Article 7(1) of the Directive 2012/19/EU on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (further on 'WEEE2'), member states will have two options for demonstrating compliance with the new minimum collection rate from 2019 onwards. They can either collect “65% of the average weight of EEE Placed on the Market (further on “POM”) in the three preceding years in the Member State concerned”, or collect “85% of WEEE generated on the territory of that Member State”

Article 7(5) WEEE2 tasks the Commission with establishing common methodologies for both, the calculation of the “weight of EEE POM” and of the “quantity of WEEE generated in each Member State” by 14 August 2015. 

The United Nations University (UNU) assisted the Commission in developing these methodologies. They also created the UNU-keys, which can be used to harmonise the domestic production, import and expert statistics needed for the POM calculation across member states. 

Orgalime fully supports the efforts of the European Commission to establish such common methodologies. On the one hand, these methodologies are crucial to ensure a clear and harmonised implementation of the collection target in each Member State. On the other hand, it is essential that the methodologies lead to fair targets, which are based on objective, clear and transparent criteria. Member States are of course free to choose, which of the two approaches they use to demonstrate the achievement of the collection rate from 2019 onwards.

Following the Commission’s stakeholder meeting on 20 May 2015, we welcome the opportunity to provide our comments on the Draft Implementing Regulation (Draft Regulation), which has been circulated to this end. Our comments refer to three parts: First, we outline our reasons for supporting the WEEE generated approach and highlight the importance of the all actors’ concept. Second, we provide three improvement suggestions for the proposed methodologies. Third, we raise three issues, which we find require further clarification

[more in download]

Related Position Papers

Environment: EU-wide uniform conditions for the proper quality treatment of WEEE: A call for Implementing Acts to lay down minimum quality WEEE treatment standards in strict accordance with the European standards [12 December 2019]

Environment: Evaluation of Directive 2011/65/EU (“RoHS”): Improving implementation in a Circular Economy context [6 December 2019]

Environment: Orgalim response to the public consultation on the RoHS evaluation [6 December 2019]

Environment: The European technology industries’ priorities for the sustainable use and management of water in Europe [14 November 2019]

Environment: Orgalim's response to a public consultation on sustainability requirements for batteries [27 August 2019]

Waste policy: Joint industry comments on modulating producers’ financial contributions for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment [26 July 2019]

Eunomia study in support of developing Guidance for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Schemes: Comments on modulation of producers’ financial contributions [12 March 2019]

Feedback on the usability of the taxonomy - Orgalim response [25 February 2019]

Orgalim response: Consultation by Technical Expert Group on Sustainable Finance [25 February 2019]