Recast Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive ('WEEE2'): Comments on Draft Guidance Document ('FAQs')

Published: 30 August 2013

Policies & Issues: Environment

Orgalime thanks the Commission for both, the possibility to comment on the Draft Frequently Asked Questions Document on Directive 2012/19/EU, and for tabling a draft, which we generally consider a largely pragmatic, well-structured and comprehensive basis for effectively clarifying certain aspects of the Directive and helping producers in their preparations for compliance.

Orgalime expresses its explicit support for the following sections of the draft FAQs:

  • The draft Q&As provided regarding the appointment and possible mandate of an authorised representative (Q 1.32 and 1.33)

  • The draft Q&As provided regarding separate collection/collection rate: we explicitly welcome the approach of including all routes and flows of WEEE for the future implementation of the Directive (Qs 1.19, 1.25 to 1.29). This will strengthen the environmental objectives of the Directive and the Commission’s wider resource efficiency policy. While we suggest removing the last paragraph of Q 1.23, we also welcome that Member States have been confirmed as the responsible addressees of the target in this entry.

  • The draft Q&As provided to secure a European approach to the marking obligations to provide information to treatment facilities (Q. 1.31).

  • The draft Q&As regarding annex VI on minimum requirements for shipments, including the suggested interpretation of certain derogations and documentation requirements in case of legal shipments (Qs 1.38, 1.39, 1.45).

  • Most parts of the draft Q&As regarding the understanding of the scope during the transition period, including the definition of “dependent”, the continuation of the existing ten scope categories during transition period, the notion “specifically designed” and exclusions of equipment that uses electrical energy only for support or control functions (Q 1.4, 1.12, 1.13, content of Q 1.3, appendix/part 2/criterion 2).

  • The draft Q&As provided regarding reuse (Q1.22).

 

Related Position Papers

Environment: Orgalim calls for an impact assessment and a delay of implementation of ECHA SCIP database [30 June 2020]

Environment: Orgalim comments on the development of sustainability requirements for batteries under a New Regulatory Framework for Batteries [26 June 2020]

Environment: Wastewater matters too: Orgalim’s recommendations for the revision of the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive [22 May 2020]

Environment: Think Blue: Orgalim recommendations for the improvement of the Water Framework Directive [22 May 2020]

Environment: Response to Commission circular economy roadmap consultation [20 January 2020]

Environment: EU-wide uniform conditions for the proper quality treatment of WEEE: A call for Implementing Acts to lay down minimum quality WEEE treatment standards in strict accordance with the European standards [12 December 2019]

Environment: Evaluation of Directive 2011/65/EU (“RoHS”): Improving implementation in a Circular Economy context [6 December 2019]

Environment: Orgalim response to the public consultation on the RoHS evaluation [6 December 2019]

Environment: The European technology industries’ priorities for the sustainable use and management of water in Europe [14 November 2019]