Proposal for an Industrial Emissions Directive: Priorities of European engineering industries for second reading

Published: 17 February 2010

Policies & Issues: Environment

Notwithstanding that some adaptations following the entry into force of the new Lisbon Treaty, and especially changes related to the new comitology procedure, still have to be clarified before the Council will adopt its final position at first reading, Orgalime would like to provide its comments and proposals on the Council Common Position (document 11962/09) of August 2009 with a view to the upcoming second reading in the European institutions.

Our industries fully support the environmental objectives of the existing IPPC directive, its integrated approach to address emissions occuring from industrial installations at local level and are committed to a proper implementation of the directive in member states.

In general, Orgalime feels that the Common Position of August 2009 strikes a balanced compromise between the initial Commission proposal, the European Parliament’s first reading report and the different views of member states delegations in the Council in a number of areas that are of key relevance for an improved implementation of the directive.

In particular, the appropriate level of flexibility for emission limit values, the maintaining of the Seville process with the indispensible involvement of technical experts for the development of BAT-BREF documents and the re-setting of the scope of the directive are ways forward to guarantee both, a high level of protection of the environment and human health and the necessary level playing field for our industries that have to face ever changing legislations in a variety of sectors.

However, we invite the European institutions to settle some remaining aspects concerning publication of information, the criteria for determining the frequency of site inspections, the necessity to carry out an impact assessment if the Commission wishes to depart from technical evidence for the adoption of BAT decisions and the introduction of a risk based approach for site remediation.

Related Position Papers

Waste policy: Joint industry comments on modulating producers’ financial contributions for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment [26 July 2019]

Eunomia study in support of developing Guidance for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Schemes: Comments on modulation of producers’ financial contributions [12 March 2019]

Feedback on the usability of the taxonomy - Orgalim response [25 February 2019]

Orgalim response: Consultation by Technical Expert Group on Sustainable Finance [25 February 2019]

Orgalime response to consultation on RoHS Substance Review Methodology [21 December 2018]

Comments on Product and Organisational Environment Footprint methodologies (PEF/OEF) [19 December 2018]

Circular Economy: Resolving the interface between EU waste, product and chemicals policy [29 October 2018]

Strategy on long-term EU Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions reduction: Turning challenges into opportunities - The contribution of the European technology industries [10 October 2018]

The EU Plastics Strategy: An Opportunity to Build a Competitive European Market for Secondary Raw Materials [10 June 2018]