Possible reforms to marking of origin legislation

Published: 23 March 2004

Policies & Issues: Trade

Orgalime feels that the current national voluntary origin marking regimes are satisfactory and thus no new legislation at the EU level is necessary.  Any changes in legislation would only create additional costs and burdens for both industry and state authorities, and we do not feel that such changes would have significant effects with regard to the enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights.

Related Position Papers

EU trade policy: Orgalim priorities for the next European Union legislative term [17 June 2019]

Trade: EU-US negotiations must tackle both tariff and non-tariff barriers [25 April 2019]

Steel Using Industries - Joint Statement on the EU Steel Safeguard Investigation [6 December 2018]

EU-US trade negotiations must tackle both tariff and non-tariff barriers [12 October 2018]

Joint letter from downstream steel users: imposition of steel safeguards not in Europe's interest [26 June 2018]

Orgalime position on the European Commission proposal on Investment Screening [9 May 2018]

Orgalime comments following the US decision to impose tariffs on foreign steel and aluminium [13 April 2018]

Orgalime comments on the implementation of the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement five years down the road [28 February 2017]

Orgalime answer to the Public Consultation on the future of EU-Turkey trade and economic relations - non-tariff and tariff barriers in trade with Turkey [6 June 2016]