Possible reforms to marking of origin legislation

Published: 23 March 2004

Policies & Issues: Trade

Orgalime feels that the current national voluntary origin marking regimes are satisfactory and thus no new legislation at the EU level is necessary.  Any changes in legislation would only create additional costs and burdens for both industry and state authorities, and we do not feel that such changes would have significant effects with regard to the enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights.

Related Position Papers

Steel Using Industries - Joint Statement on the EU Steel Safeguard Investigation [6/12/2018]

EU-US trade negotiations must tackle both tariff and non-tariff barriers [12/10/2018]

Joint letter from downstream steel users: imposition of steel safeguards not in Europe's interest [26/6/2018]

Orgalime position on the European Commission proposal on Investment Screening [9/5/2018]

Orgalime comments following the US decision to impose tariffs on foreign steel and aluminium [13/4/2018]

Orgalime comments on the implementation of the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement five years down the road [28/2/2017]

Orgalime answer to the Public Consultation on the future of EU-Turkey trade and economic relations - non-tariff and tariff barriers in trade with Turkey [6/6/2016]

EU businesses call for a Union Customs Code that continues to support the global supply chain, economic recovery and innovation – September 2015 [23/9/2015]

Orgalime comments on EU’s position paper on the engineering industries and TTIP [21/4/2015]