Policy options for the review of Directive 2002/95/EC (RoHS)

Published: 13 February 2008

Policies & Issues: Environment

Orgalime thanks the Commission for consulting stakeholders on a set of policy options currently under consideration and herewith provides its contribution to the debate. Following some general principles, Orgalime's comments are structured according to the five basic headings given in DG Environment‟s consultation paper. Under each chapter heading, Orgalime provides its views on the various policy options proposed in the Commission‟s consultation document, but also adds its proposals for alternative options not included in the consultation document but considered relevant by our industries.

Related Position Papers

Environment: Orgalim's response to a public consultation on sustainability requirements for batteries [27 August 2019]

Waste policy: Joint industry comments on modulating producers’ financial contributions for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment [26 July 2019]

Eunomia study in support of developing Guidance for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Schemes: Comments on modulation of producers’ financial contributions [12 March 2019]

Orgalim response: Consultation by Technical Expert Group on Sustainable Finance [25 February 2019]

Feedback on the usability of the taxonomy - Orgalim response [25 February 2019]

Orgalime response to consultation on RoHS Substance Review Methodology [21 December 2018]

Comments on Product and Organisational Environment Footprint methodologies (PEF/OEF) [19 December 2018]

Circular Economy: Resolving the interface between EU waste, product and chemicals policy [29 October 2018]

Strategy on long-term EU Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions reduction: Turning challenges into opportunities - The contribution of the European technology industries [10 October 2018]