Orgalime response to consultation on RoHS Substance Review Methodology

Published: 21 December 2018

Policies & Issues: Environment

Orgalime, representing Europe’s Technology Industries, including European manufacturers of electrical and electronic equipment (EEE), thanks the Öko-Institut for the opportunity to comment on the draft of the revised manual methodology for identification and assessment of substances for inclusion in the list of restricted substances (Annex II) under the RoHS 2 Directive 2011/65/EU prepared in the framework of the Study to support the review of the list of restricted substances and to assess a new exemption request under RoHS (RoHS Pack 15). 

We reiterate our support to the objective of the RoHS Directive laying down rules on the restriction of the use of hazardous substances in EEE with a view to contributing to the protection of human health and the environment, including the environmentally sound recovery and disposal of waste EEE. 

We welcome the re-evaluation of the methodology for identification and assessment of substances for inclusion in the list of RoHS restricted substances (Annex II) as published in 2013 by the Austrian Umweltbundesamt (AUBA 2013) considering its serious shortcomings. The present AUBA methodology indeed does not provide a reliable and comprehensible basis for the future revisions of Annex II of the RoHS Directive. 

For a proper implementation of both RoHS and REACH, a thorough substance identification and evaluation methodology is a prerogative. Any new substance restriction under RoHS, and any other legislation on chemicals must be based on a robust, science-based and consistent substance evaluation methodology. 

To read our recommendations in full, please download the document.


Sigrid Linher
Director - Energy, Climate & Environment
Stéphanie Mittelham
Manager - Environment

Related Position Papers

Environment: Response to Commission circular economy roadmap consultation [20 January 2020]

Environment: EU-wide uniform conditions for the proper quality treatment of WEEE: A call for Implementing Acts to lay down minimum quality WEEE treatment standards in strict accordance with the European standards [12 December 2019]

Environment: Evaluation of Directive 2011/65/EU (“RoHS”): Improving implementation in a Circular Economy context [6 December 2019]

Environment: Orgalim response to the public consultation on the RoHS evaluation [6 December 2019]

Environment: The European technology industries’ priorities for the sustainable use and management of water in Europe [14 November 2019]

Environment: Orgalim's response to a public consultation on sustainability requirements for batteries [27 August 2019]

Waste policy: Joint industry comments on modulating producers’ financial contributions for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment [26 July 2019]

Eunomia study in support of developing Guidance for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Schemes: Comments on modulation of producers’ financial contributions [12 March 2019]

Feedback on the usability of the taxonomy - Orgalim response [25 February 2019]