Orgalime position on the European Commission proposal on Investment Screening

Published: 9 May 2018

Policies & Issues: Trade

Orgalime believes that the European market needs to remain open to foreign direct investment, considering its positive impact on growth and employment. We question the need for a second layer of investment screening at European level and believe that the European Commission underestimates the negative effects such a legislation would entail in the long run, namely an erosion of companies’ freedom to invest in “critical technologies” such as robots, semiconductors and dual-use good, leading to an overall decrease of investments in such technologies.

Please download the document to read the recommendations in full.

Authors

Selandari
Silvia Selandari
Adviser - Trade & Legal

Related Position Papers

Trade: EU-US negotiations must tackle both tariff and non-tariff barriers [25 April 2019]

Steel Using Industries - Joint Statement on the EU Steel Safeguard Investigation [6 December 2018]

EU-US trade negotiations must tackle both tariff and non-tariff barriers [12 October 2018]

Joint letter from downstream steel users: imposition of steel safeguards not in Europe's interest [26 June 2018]

Orgalime position on the European Commission proposal on Investment Screening [9 May 2018]

Orgalime comments following the US decision to impose tariffs on foreign steel and aluminium [13 April 2018]

Orgalime comments on the implementation of the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement five years down the road [28 February 2017]

Orgalime answer to the Public Consultation on the future of EU-Turkey trade and economic relations - non-tariff and tariff barriers in trade with Turkey [6 June 2016]

EU businesses call for a Union Customs Code that continues to support the global supply chain, economic recovery and innovation – September 2015 [23 September 2015]