Directive 2011/65/EU (“RoHS2”): Impact Assessment of Article 2.2

Published: 15 June 2012

Policies & Issues: Environment

Following the last BioIS stakeholder meeting on the RoHS2 scope impact assessment study, Orgalime appreciates the opportunity to provide additional input to the current discussion on impacts of article 2.2 RoHS2 and the notion of “making available” in particular.

This issue is relevant for any equipment newly in scope following the recast of the Directive (see Orgalime’s earlier comments): If BioIS maintained its understanding that new equipment could fall either under category 11 or any other category of Annex I of RoHS2, the given scope of the impact assessment on category 11 “only” is too narrow and its results may be misleading and incomplete as all other affected product categories would not be taken into account.

Related Position Papers

Environment: EU-wide uniform conditions for the proper quality treatment of WEEE: A call for Implementing Acts to lay down minimum quality WEEE treatment standards in strict accordance with the European standards [12 December 2019]

Environment: Evaluation of Directive 2011/65/EU (“RoHS”): Improving implementation in a Circular Economy context [6 December 2019]

Environment: Orgalim response to the public consultation on the RoHS evaluation [6 December 2019]

Environment: The European technology industries’ priorities for the sustainable use and management of water in Europe [14 November 2019]

Environment: Orgalim's response to a public consultation on sustainability requirements for batteries [27 August 2019]

Waste policy: Joint industry comments on modulating producers’ financial contributions for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment [26 July 2019]

Eunomia study in support of developing Guidance for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Schemes: Comments on modulation of producers’ financial contributions [12 March 2019]

Orgalim response: Consultation by Technical Expert Group on Sustainable Finance [25 February 2019]

Feedback on the usability of the taxonomy - Orgalim response [25 February 2019]