Development of resource efficiency and waste management assessment methods to identify eco design requirements

Published: 16 January 2012

Policies & Issues: Environment

Orgalime supports the general objectives of the EU’s Resource Efficiency policy and agrees that energy efficiency represents a priority topic, not only in the context of the EU’s energy and climate change policy, but also in that respect. 

We therefore also support that the Eco Design Directive in its ongoing implementation, has assessed and, where this has been identified as a significant factor, regulated on the parameters of a product’s energy and water consumption in the use phase, thereby already contributing to the EU’s resource efficiency policy objectives. 

Any further eco design parameter and methodology needs to be developed in full application of all criteria and procedural aspects of the Eco Design Directive. This is in our view not the case in the ongoing JRC study and its methodological approach. In particular, the methodological approach is not in line with article 15 of the Eco Design Directive and the requirement of demonstrating 'significant potential for improvement in terms of its environmental impact without entailing excessive costs'

The four resource efficiency parameters presented by JRC are in our view not promising in terms of significant environmental improvement potential from a life cycle perspective, while the proposed methodological approach ignores the existing MEErP methodology that has been particularly established for the implementation of the Eco Design Directive.

Related Position Papers

Environment: Orgalim's response to a public consultation on sustainability requirements for batteries [27 August 2019]

Waste policy: Joint industry comments on modulating producers’ financial contributions for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment [26 July 2019]

Eunomia study in support of developing Guidance for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Schemes: Comments on modulation of producers’ financial contributions [12 March 2019]

Feedback on the usability of the taxonomy - Orgalim response [25 February 2019]

Orgalim response: Consultation by Technical Expert Group on Sustainable Finance [25 February 2019]

Orgalime response to consultation on RoHS Substance Review Methodology [21 December 2018]

Comments on Product and Organisational Environment Footprint methodologies (PEF/OEF) [19 December 2018]

Circular Economy: Resolving the interface between EU waste, product and chemicals policy [29 October 2018]

Strategy on long-term EU Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions reduction: Turning challenges into opportunities - The contribution of the European technology industries [10 October 2018]